Saudi's new AI initiative "Humain"

Attorney fined for submitting AI-generated legal brief

In partnership with

In Today’s Issue:

  • Saudi's new AI initiative "Humain"

  • Attorney fined for submitting AI-generated legal brief

Read time: 3 minutes

Saudi's new AI initiative "Humain"

Earlier today, Donald Trump announced $600 billion in AI and defense deals with Saudi Arabia. Headlining the pact, Saudi Arabia’s new state-owned AI company, Humain, will deploy 18,000 of Nvidia’s latest Blackwell servers, tens of billions of dollars worth of chips, over five years, making it one of the largest single AI-chip orders ever. AMD is co-investing up to $10 billion, and Amazon pledged $5 billion toward data-center infrastructure. Nvidia shares jumped 5.6% on the news, with AMD up 4% and Amazon rising 1.3%.

The announcements came at a high-profile investment forum in Riyadh attended by Elon Musk, Jensen Huang, Sam Altman, and top financiers like Stephen Schwarzman and Larry Fink. Notably, the Trump administration has just reversed a Biden-era rule that would have restricted Saudi access to advanced US AI chips, clearing the way for Humain’s massive order.

Trump and MBS

Achieve More With Limited Resources: 15 Small Budget Success Stories

Strategic marketing doesn't require enterprise-level spending. Our latest case studies reveal how 15 small brands achieved remarkable outcomes through creativity and smart resource allocation.

  • Innovative tactics that delivered exceptional ROI with minimal investment

  • Strategic approaches that helped small teams compete against industry giants

  • Data-driven techniques for maximizing impact when resources are limited

Looking for ways to stretch your marketing budget further? These 15 mini case studies show exactly how these small brands made such big waves without breaking the bank.

Attorney fined for submitting AI-generated legal brief

A California judge has fined two law firms $31,000 after discovering they submitted a legal brief filled with fake citations generated by AI. U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael Wilner sharply criticized the attorneys for relying on artificial intelligence tools to conduct legal research without proper verification or disclosure, stating that “no reasonably competent attorney” would delegate legal research to AI and blindly trust the results. The case involved a civil dispute against State Farm, and the problematic brief originated from an AI-generated outline created using Google Gemini and Westlaw Precision’s AI tools. That outline was passed along to K&L Gates, a separate firm that incorporated fictitious cases into the filing without checking their authenticity.

Initially, the citations appeared convincing enough that Judge Wilner said he nearly relied on them to draft a court order. But when he attempted to verify the sources, he discovered that several of the cases simply didn’t exist. Even worse, after the court raised concerns, a revised brief submitted by the firms included additional fabricated quotes and authorities. The lawyers later admitted to using AI to prepare portions of the filing, but only after the court demanded an explanation and pointed out the inconsistencies.

How was today's newsletter?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

Reply

or to participate.